drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
code duplication.
Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
unlikely that we will extend it any time soon so no reason to kee
drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
code duplication.
Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
unlikely that we will extend it any time soon so no reason to kee
drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
code duplication.
Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
unlikely that we will extend it any time soon so no reason to kee
drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
code duplication.
Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
unlikely that we will extend it any time soon so no reason to kee
drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
code duplication.
Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
unlikely that we will extend it any time soon so no reason to kee
drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
code duplication.
Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
unlikely that we will extend it any time soon so no reason to kee
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56:32AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init().
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> drm_gem_object_init() and drm_gem_private_object_init() do exactly the
> same (except for shmem alloc) so make the first use the latter to reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Also drop the return code from drm_gem_private_object_init(). It seems
30 matches
Mail list logo