On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:30:42PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Vetter (2019-05-08 13:53:30)
> > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:06 PM Chris Wilson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently there is an underlying assumption that i915_request_unsubmit()
> > > is synchronous wrt the GPU -- that is
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2019-05-08 13:53:30)
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:06 PM Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Currently there is an underlying assumption that i915_request_unsubmit()
> > is synchronous wrt the GPU -- that is the request is no longer in flight
> > as we remove it. In the near future
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:06 PM Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> Currently there is an underlying assumption that i915_request_unsubmit()
> is synchronous wrt the GPU -- that is the request is no longer in flight
> as we remove it. In the near future that may change, and this may upset
> our signaling as
Currently there is an underlying assumption that i915_request_unsubmit()
is synchronous wrt the GPU -- that is the request is no longer in flight
as we remove it. In the near future that may change, and this may upset
our signaling as we can process an interrupt for that request while it
is no
