Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-05-03 12:23:31)
> On 2021-04-29 20:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-29 10:23:31)
> >> On 2021-04-29 02:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> > Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-28 10:38:11)
> >> >> On 2021-04-27 17:00, Stephen Boyd
On 2021-04-29 20:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-29 10:23:31)
On 2021-04-29 02:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-28 10:38:11)
>> On 2021-04-27 17:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > Quoting aravi...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-21 11:55:21)
>>
Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-29 10:23:31)
> On 2021-04-29 02:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-28 10:38:11)
> >> On 2021-04-27 17:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> > Quoting aravi...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-21 11:55:21)
> >> >> On 2021-04-21 10:26,
On 2021-04-29 02:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-28 10:38:11)
On 2021-04-27 17:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting aravi...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-21 11:55:21)
>> On 2021-04-21 10:26, khs...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> +
>> >>>
Quoting khs...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-28 10:38:11)
> On 2021-04-27 17:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting aravi...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-21 11:55:21)
> >> On 2021-04-21 10:26, khs...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> +
> >> >>> mutex_unlock(>event_mutex);
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
On 2021-04-27 17:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting aravi...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-21 11:55:21)
On 2021-04-21 10:26, khs...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>
>>> +
>>> mutex_unlock(>event_mutex);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> @@ -1496,6 +1502,9 @@ int msm_dp_display_disable(struct msm_dp *dp,
>>>
Quoting aravi...@codeaurora.org (2021-04-21 11:55:21)
> On 2021-04-21 10:26, khs...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> mutex_unlock(>event_mutex);
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> @@ -1496,6 +1502,9 @@ int msm_dp_display_disable(struct msm_dp *dp,
> >>> struct drm_encoder
On 2021-04-21 10:26, khs...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2021-04-20 15:01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-04-16 13:27:57)
Some dongle may generate more than one irq_hpd events in a short
period of
time. This patch will treat those irq_hpd events as single one and
service
only one
On 2021-04-20 15:01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-04-16 13:27:57)
Some dongle may generate more than one irq_hpd events in a short
period of
time. This patch will treat those irq_hpd events as single one and
service
only one irq_hpd event.
Why is it bad to get multiple
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-04-16 13:27:57)
> Some dongle may generate more than one irq_hpd events in a short period of
> time. This patch will treat those irq_hpd events as single one and service
> only one irq_hpd event.
Why is it bad to get multiple irq_hpd events in a short period of time?
Some dongle may generate more than one irq_hpd events in a short period of
time. This patch will treat those irq_hpd events as single one and service
only one irq_hpd event.
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff
11 matches
Mail list logo
