On 08/05/2010 09:09 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> From: Ben Skeggs
>
> Existing core code/drivers call drm_mm_put_block on ttm_mem_reg.mm_node
> directly. Future patches will modify TTM behaviour in such a way that
> ttm_mem_reg.mm_node doesn't necessarily belong to drm_mm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Ske
On 08/05/2010 09:09 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> From: Ben Skeggs
>
> Existing core code/drivers call drm_mm_put_block on ttm_mem_reg.mm_node
> directly. Future patches will modify TTM behaviour in such a way that
> ttm_mem_reg.mm_node doesn't necessarily belong to drm_mm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Ske
From: Ben Skeggs
Existing core code/drivers call drm_mm_put_block on ttm_mem_reg.mm_node
directly. Future patches will modify TTM behaviour in such a way that
ttm_mem_reg.mm_node doesn't necessarily belong to drm_mm.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 14 ++
From: Ben Skeggs
Existing core code/drivers call drm_mm_put_block on ttm_mem_reg.mm_node
directly. Future patches will modify TTM behaviour in such a way that
ttm_mem_reg.mm_node doesn't necessarily belong to drm_mm.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 14 ++