On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:16:13PM +0100, Vincent ABRIOU wrote:
>
>
> On 02/29/2016 04:32 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Vincent ABRIOU wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Have you any comment for this proposal?
> >
> > I guess since we don't really have userspace
On 02/29/2016 04:32 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Vincent ABRIOU wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have you any comment for this proposal?
>
> I guess since we don't really have userspace that uses interlaced modes,
> much less actually bothers to get the fields correct
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Vincent ABRIOU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have you any comment for this proposal?
I guess since we don't really have userspace that uses interlaced modes,
much less actually bothers to get the fields correct I think just have
some (open-source) userspace somewhere
Hi,
Have you any comment for this proposal?
BR
Vincent
On 02/12/2016 10:26 AM, Vincent Abriou wrote:
> From: Fabien Dessenne
>
> If a buffer is interlaced, this "Bottom Field First" flag specifies
> which of the top or the bottom field shall be displayed first.
> When set, the bottom field
From: Fabien Dessenne
If a buffer is interlaced, this "Bottom Field First" flag specifies
which of the top or the bottom field shall be displayed first.
When set, the bottom field shall be displayed first.
When unset the top field shall be displayed first.
Signed-off-by: