Re: [PATCH 1/2] fbdev: Split frame buffer support in FB and FB_CORE symbols

2023-06-30 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
"Arnd Bergmann" writes: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, at 12:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> "Arnd Bergmann" writes: >> @@ -59,7 +71,7 @@ config FIRMWARE_EDID config FB_DEVICE bool "Provide legacy /dev/fb* device" - depends on FB + depends on FB_CORE

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fbdev: Split frame buffer support in FB and FB_CORE symbols

2023-06-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, at 12:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > "Arnd Bergmann" writes: > >>> @@ -59,7 +71,7 @@ config FIRMWARE_EDID >>> >>> config FB_DEVICE >>> bool "Provide legacy /dev/fb* device" >>> - depends on FB >>> + depends on FB_CORE >>> default y >>> help >>>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fbdev: Split frame buffer support in FB and FB_CORE symbols

2023-06-30 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
"Arnd Bergmann" writes: Hello Arnd, Thanks for your review! > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, at 00:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Currently the CONFIG_FB option has to be enabled even if no legacy fbdev >> drivers are needed (e.g: only to have support for framebuffer consoles). >> >> The DRM sub

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fbdev: Split frame buffer support in FB and FB_CORE symbols

2023-06-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, at 00:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Currently the CONFIG_FB option has to be enabled even if no legacy fbdev > drivers are needed (e.g: only to have support for framebuffer consoles). > > The DRM subsystem has a fbdev emulation layer, but depends on CONFIG_FB > and so

[PATCH 1/2] fbdev: Split frame buffer support in FB and FB_CORE symbols

2023-06-29 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Currently the CONFIG_FB option has to be enabled even if no legacy fbdev drivers are needed (e.g: only to have support for framebuffer consoles). The DRM subsystem has a fbdev emulation layer, but depends on CONFIG_FB and so it can only be enabled if that dependency is enabled as well. That means