On 2024-02-26 17:53, Christian König wrote:
> Am 26.02.24 um 17:50 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 2024-02-26 17:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 2024-02-26 17:34, Christian König wrote:
>>>
My question is why has it worked so far? I mean we are not doing this
since yesterday and the
Am 26.02.24 um 17:50 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2024-02-26 17:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2024-02-26 17:34, Christian König wrote:
My question is why has it worked so far? I mean we are not doing this since
yesterday and the problem only shows up now?
Yes, Wayland compositors are only
On 2024-02-26 17:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2024-02-26 17:34, Christian König wrote:
>
>> My question is why has it worked so far? I mean we are not doing this since
>> yesterday and the problem only shows up now?
>
> Yes, Wayland compositors are only starting to try and make use of this
On 2024-02-26 17:34, Christian König wrote:
> Am 26.02.24 um 17:27 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 2024-02-26 16:58, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 23.02.24 um 17:43 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2024-02-23 11:04, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2024-02-23 10:34, Christian König wrote:
>> Am
Am 26.02.24 um 17:27 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2024-02-26 16:58, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um 17:43 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2024-02-23 11:04, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2024-02-23 10:34, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um 09:11 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2024-02-23 08:06,
On 2024-02-26 16:58, Christian König wrote:
> Am 23.02.24 um 17:43 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 2024-02-23 11:04, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 2024-02-23 10:34, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um 09:11 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On 2024-02-23 08:06, Christian König wrote:
>> Am
Am 23.02.24 um 17:43 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2024-02-23 11:04, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2024-02-23 10:34, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um 09:11 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2024-02-23 08:06, Christian König wrote:
Am 22.02.24 um 18:28 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer
Pinning
On 2024-02-23 11:04, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2024-02-23 10:34, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 23.02.24 um 09:11 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>>> On 2024-02-23 08:06, Christian König wrote:
Am 22.02.24 um 18:28 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> Pinning the BO storage to
On 2024-02-23 10:34, Christian König wrote:
> Am 23.02.24 um 09:11 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 2024-02-23 08:06, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 22.02.24 um 18:28 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer
Pinning the BO storage to VRAM for scanout would make it inaccessible
to
Am 23.02.24 um 09:11 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2024-02-23 08:06, Christian König wrote:
Am 22.02.24 um 18:28 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer
Pinning the BO storage to VRAM for scanout would make it inaccessible
to non-P2P dma-buf importers.
Thinking more about it I don't think we
On 2024-02-23 09:11, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2024-02-23 08:06, Christian König wrote:
>>
>> So rejecting things during CS and atomic commit is the best thing we can do.
>
> It's problematic for a Wayland compositor:
>
> The CS ioctl failing is awkward. With GL, I'm pretty sure it means the
>
On 2024-02-23 08:06, Christian König wrote:
> Am 22.02.24 um 18:28 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> From: Michel Dänzer
>>
>> Pinning the BO storage to VRAM for scanout would make it inaccessible
>> to non-P2P dma-buf importers.
>
> Thinking more about it I don't think we can do this.
>
> Using the BO
Am 22.02.24 um 18:28 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer
Pinning the BO storage to VRAM for scanout would make it inaccessible
to non-P2P dma-buf importers.
Thinking more about it I don't think we can do this.
Using the BO in a ping/pong fashion for scanout and DMA-buf is actually
From: Michel Dänzer
Pinning the BO storage to VRAM for scanout would make it inaccessible
to non-P2P dma-buf importers.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/10635
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 38 ++---
1
14 matches
Mail list logo
