Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: access registers via a regmap

2019-11-04 Thread Neil Armstrong
Hi Adrian, On 04/11/2019 13:03, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > On Mon, 04 Nov 2019, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On 31/10/2019 15:26, Adrian Ratiu wrote: >> >> OK for the dw-mipi-dsi changes, but why should the dw_mipi_dsi-stm be >> changed aswell ? >> AFAIK these are independent. > > I don't understand how

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: access registers via a regmap

2019-11-04 Thread Adrian Ratiu
On Mon, 04 Nov 2019, Neil Armstrong wrote: On 31/10/2019 15:26, Adrian Ratiu wrote: Convert the common bridge code and the two rockchip & stm drivers which currently use it to the regmap API in anticipation for further changes to make it more generic and add older DSI host controller support

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: access registers via a regmap

2019-11-04 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 31/10/2019 15:26, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > Convert the common bridge code and the two rockchip & stm drivers > which currently use it to the regmap API in anticipation for further > changes to make it more generic and add older DSI host controller > support as found on i.mx6 based devices. > > No

[PATCH 1/4] drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: access registers via a regmap

2019-10-31 Thread Adrian Ratiu
Convert the common bridge code and the two rockchip & stm drivers which currently use it to the regmap API in anticipation for further changes to make it more generic and add older DSI host controller support as found on i.mx6 based devices. No functional changes other than requiring the platform