On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 03:51:36PM +0200, Yussuf Khalil wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 14:41 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:40:22PM +0200, Yussuf Khalil wrote:
> > > Add a new flag to mark modes that are considered a CE mode
> > > according to the
> > > CEA-861 specifica
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 14:41 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:40:22PM +0200, Yussuf Khalil wrote:
> > Add a new flag to mark modes that are considered a CE mode
> > according to the
> > CEA-861 specification. Modes without this flag are implicitly
> > considered to
> > be IT
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:40:22PM +0200, Yussuf Khalil wrote:
> Add a new flag to mark modes that are considered a CE mode according to the
> CEA-861 specification. Modes without this flag are implicitly considered to
> be IT modes.
>
> User-space applications may use this flag to determine possi
Add a new flag to mark modes that are considered a CE mode according to the
CEA-861 specification. Modes without this flag are implicitly considered to
be IT modes.
User-space applications may use this flag to determine possible
implications of using a CE mode (e.g., limited RGB range).
There is
