Re: [PATCH 10/24] drm/mtk: mtk_drm_fb -> drm_framebuffer

2018-05-18 Thread CK Hu
On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 22:11 +0800, Daniel Stone wrote: > Now that mtk_drm_fb is an empty wrapper around drm_framebuffer, we can > just delete it. > Reviewed-by: CK Hu > Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone > Cc: CK Hu > Cc: Philipp Zabel

Re: [PATCH 10/24] drm/mtk: mtk_drm_fb -> drm_framebuffer

2018-05-17 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:11:24PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > Now that mtk_drm_fb is an empty wrapper around drm_framebuffer, we can > just delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone > Cc: CK Hu > Cc: Philipp Zabel > --- >

Re: [PATCH 10/24] drm/mtk: mtk_drm_fb -> drm_framebuffer

2018-05-17 Thread Sean Paul
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:11:24PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > Now that mtk_drm_fb is an empty wrapper around drm_framebuffer, we can > just delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone > Cc: CK Hu > Cc: Philipp Zabel

Re: [PATCH 10/24] drm/mtk: mtk_drm_fb -> drm_framebuffer

2018-05-17 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi CK, Philipp, On 30 March 2018 at 15:11, Daniel Stone wrote: > Now that mtk_drm_fb is an empty wrapper around drm_framebuffer, we can > just delete it. Did you get a chance to look at these three patches for Mediatek? Cheers, Daniel

[PATCH 10/24] drm/mtk: mtk_drm_fb -> drm_framebuffer

2018-03-30 Thread Daniel Stone
Now that mtk_drm_fb is an empty wrapper around drm_framebuffer, we can just delete it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone Cc: CK Hu Cc: Philipp Zabel --- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_fb.c | 40 ---