On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 09:27:01AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > We already have it in v3d_dev->drm.dev with zero additional pointer
> > chasing. Personally I don't like duplicated pointers like this
> > because:
> >
Hi Daniel.
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We already have it in v3d_dev->drm.dev with zero additional pointer
> chasing. Personally I don't like duplicated pointers like this
> because:
> - reviewers need to check whether the pointer is for the same or
> different
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> We already have it in v3d_dev->drm.dev with zero additional pointer
> chasing. Personally I don't like duplicated pointers like this
> because:
> - reviewers need to check whether the pointer is for the same or
> different objects if there's
We already have it in v3d_dev->drm.dev with zero additional pointer
chasing. Personally I don't like duplicated pointers like this
because:
- reviewers need to check whether the pointer is for the same or
different objects if there's multiple
- compilers have an easier time too
To avoid having to
