On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:47:34AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:36:36 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:56:17AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > The point of this review process is that userspace using the new uAPI
> > > can actually live with t
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:36:36 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:56:17AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > The point of this review process is that userspace using the new uAPI
> > can actually live with the uAPI being provided, and it's hard to know
> > that without having actual
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:56:17AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The point of this review process is that userspace using the new uAPI
> can actually live with the uAPI being provided, and it's hard to know
> that without having actually looked into a kernel patch yourself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric A
The point of this review process is that userspace using the new uAPI
can actually live with the uAPI being provided, and it's hard to know
that without having actually looked into a kernel patch yourself.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter
---
Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
