[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:30:54PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:40:45AM -0400, Lyu

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 20:05 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 07:00:29PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:41:40PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:40:45AM -0400, Lyude wrote: >> > > -drm_dp_dpcd_read(aux, DP_DPCD_REV, buffer,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 07:00:29PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:41:40PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:41:40PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:40:45AM -0400, Lyude wrote: > > > > Since we've fixed up drm_dp_d

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:40:45AM -0400, Lyude wrote: > > > Since we've fixed up drm_dp_dpcd_read() to allow for retries when things > > > timeout, there's no use

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:40:45AM -0400, Lyude wrote: > > Since we've fixed up drm_dp_dpcd_read() to allow for retries when things > > timeout, there's no use for having this function anymore. Good riddens. > > > > Signed-off-by:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:56:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Lyude wrote: > > Since we've fixed up drm_dp_dpcd_read() to allow for retries when things > > timeout, there's no use for having this function anymore. Good riddens. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude > > --- > > drive

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:40:45AM -0400, Lyude wrote: > Since we've fixed up drm_dp_dpcd_read() to allow for retries when things > timeout, there's no use for having this function anymore. Good riddens. > > Signed-off-by: Lyude > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 79 > ---

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Lyude wrote: > Since we've fixed up drm_dp_dpcd_read() to allow for retries when things > timeout, there's no use for having this function anymore. Good riddens. > > Signed-off-by: Lyude > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 79 >

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Get rid of intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake()

Since we've fixed up drm_dp_dpcd_read() to allow for retries when things timeout, there's no use for having this function anymore. Good riddens. Signed-off-by: Lyude --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 79 - 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 57 deletions