On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:34 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I had something like the attached in mind, although it might be more
> beneficial to do the actual refcounting in drivers that needs it. Atomic
> incs and decs are expensive, but I'm not sure how expensive relative to
>
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 04:03 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:34 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ben,
>>>
>>> I had something like the attached in mind, although it might be more
>>> beneficial to do the actual
On 11/09/2010 04:03 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:34 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>
>> Ben,
>>
>> I had something like the attached in mind, although it might be more
>> beneficial to do the actual refcounting in drivers that needs it. Atomic
>> incs and decs are
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:34 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Ben,
I had something like the attached in mind, although it might be more
beneficial to do the actual refcounting in drivers that needs it. Atomic
incs and decs are expensive, but I'm not sure how expensive relative to
function
On 11/09/2010 04:03 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:34 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Ben,
I had something like the attached in mind, although it might be more
beneficial to do the actual refcounting in drivers that needs it. Atomic
incs and decs are expensive, but I'm not
Ben,
I had something like the attached in mind, although it might be more
beneficial to do the actual refcounting in drivers that needs it. Atomic
incs and decs are expensive, but I'm not sure how expensive relative to
function pointer calls.
Patch is only compile-tested
/Thomas
On
On 11/04/2010 01:03 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> From: Ben Skeggs
>
> If the driver kmaps an object userspace is expecting to be mapped, the
> unmap would have called down into the drivers io_unreserve() function
> and potentially unmapped the pages from its BARs (for example) and they'd
> no longer be
From: Ben Skeggs
If the driver kmaps an object userspace is expecting to be mapped, the
unmap would have called down into the drivers io_unreserve() function
and potentially unmapped the pages from its BARs (for example) and they'd
no longer be accessible for the userspace
On 11/04/2010 01:03 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
From: Ben Skeggsbske...@redhat.com
If the driver kmaps an object userspace is expecting to be mapped, the
unmap would have called down into the drivers io_unreserve() function
and potentially unmapped the pages from its BARs (for example) and they'd
no
Ben,
I had something like the attached in mind, although it might be more
beneficial to do the actual refcounting in drivers that needs it. Atomic
incs and decs are expensive, but I'm not sure how expensive relative to
function pointer calls.
Patch is only compile-tested
/Thomas
On
From: Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com
If the driver kmaps an object userspace is expecting to be mapped, the
unmap would have called down into the drivers io_unreserve() function
and potentially unmapped the pages from its BARs (for example) and they'd
no longer be accessible for the userspace
11 matches
Mail list logo