On 2/3/2023 23:29, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
I see you are inferring that a guc-id of zero can be valid.
I am guessing that might have contributed to some lost captures?
Thanks for catching this.
I'm not inferring anything. I might be implying something, though. The
patch description prob
I see you are inferring that a guc-id of zero can be valid.
I am guessing that might have contributed to some lost captures?
Thanks for catching this.
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 17:10 -0800, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison
>
> The comparison in the se
From: John Harrison
The comparison in the search for a matching register capture node was
not the most readable. So remove two redundant terms and re-format to
keep each term on a single line, and only one term per line.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_cap
