On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 12:53 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The next patch wants the vfio_device instead. There is no reason to
> store
> a pointer here since we can container_of back to the vfio_device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 44
The next patch wants the vfio_device instead. There is no reason to store
a pointer here since we can container_of back to the vfio_device.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 44 +++--
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h | 4 +--
