On 23 August 2021 22:13:45 BST, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>> > When locking a region, we currently clamp to a PAGE_SIZE as the minimum
>> > lock region. While this is valid for Midgard, it is invalid for Bifrost,
>>
>> While the spec does seem to state it's invalid for Bifrost - kbase
>> didn't bo
> > When locking a region, we currently clamp to a PAGE_SIZE as the minimum
> > lock region. While this is valid for Midgard, it is invalid for Bifrost,
>
> While the spec does seem to state it's invalid for Bifrost - kbase
> didn't bother with a lower clamp for a long time. I actually think this
On 20/08/2021 22:31, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> When locking a region, we currently clamp to a PAGE_SIZE as the minimum
> lock region. While this is valid for Midgard, it is invalid for Bifrost,
While the spec does seem to state it's invalid for Bifrost - kbase
didn't bother with a lower clamp for
When locking a region, we currently clamp to a PAGE_SIZE as the minimum
lock region. While this is valid for Midgard, it is invalid for Bifrost,
where the minimum locking size is 8x larger than the 4k page size. Add a
hardware definition for the minimum lock region size (corresponding to
KBASE_LOCK
