On 01.11.2014 03:10, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> From: Michel Dänzer
>>
>> In the words of Daniel Vetter:
>>
>> «I think SEARCH_BEST is pretty much always a bad idea - it rips apart
>> allocations from the same execbuf, and usually those get r
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 01.11.2014 03:10, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Michel Dänzer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Michel Dänzer
>>>
>>> In the words of Daniel Vetter:
>>>
>>> «I think SEARCH_BEST is pretty much always a bad idea - i
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> In the words of Daniel Vetter:
>
> «I think SEARCH_BEST is pretty much always a bad idea - it rips apart
> allocations from the same execbuf, and usually those get recycled around
> the same time. Which means you'l
From: Michel Dänzer
In the words of Daniel Vetter:
«I think SEARCH_BEST is pretty much always a bad idea - it rips apart
allocations from the same execbuf, and usually those get recycled around
the same time. Which means you'll just fragment your mm even more if you
try to find the best hole i