Am 12.05.2017 um 02:34 schrieb Dave Airlie:
From: Dave Airlie
This creates a new command submission chunk for amdgpu
to add in and out sync objects around the submission.
Sync objects are managed via the drm syncobj ioctls.
The command submission interface is enhanced
On 2017年05月12日 12:17, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 12 May 2017 at 13:34, zhoucm1 wrote:
1. generally, functions in amdgpu_cs.c should be with amdgpu_cs_ as prefix.
Okay I've fixed this and previous patch up locally.
2. If I'm not wrong to your proposal, SYNCOBJ_IN is to
On 12 May 2017 at 13:34, zhoucm1 wrote:
> 1. generally, functions in amdgpu_cs.c should be with amdgpu_cs_ as prefix.
Okay I've fixed this and previous patch up locally.
> 2. If I'm not wrong to your proposal, SYNCOBJ_IN is to semaphore wait while
> SYNCOBJ_OUT is to
1. generally, functions in amdgpu_cs.c should be with amdgpu_cs_ as prefix.
2. If I'm not wrong to your proposal, SYNCOBJ_IN is to semaphore wait
while SYNCOBJ_OUT is to semaphore signal. SYNCOBJ_IN/OUT both are based
on command submission ioctl, that means user space must generate CS when
From: Dave Airlie
This creates a new command submission chunk for amdgpu
to add in and out sync objects around the submission.
Sync objects are managed via the drm syncobj ioctls.
The command submission interface is enhanced with two new
chunks, one for syncobj pre
From: Dave Airlie
This creates a new command submission chunk for amdgpu
to add in and out sync objects around the submission.
Sync objects are managed via the drm syncobj ioctls.
The command submission interface is enhanced with two new
chunks, one for syncobj pre