On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:38:54AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:36:11 +0200
> Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset
> > functions) introduces an init_clock_gating-pointer. There is one case,
> > however, where it does no
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:55:53 +0200
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:38:54AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:36:11 +0200
> > Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset
> > > functions) introduces an init_cl
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:55:53 +0200
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:38:54AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:36:11 +0200
> > Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset
> > > functions) introduces an init_cl
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:38:54AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:36:11 +0200
> Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset
> > functions) introduces an init_clock_gating-pointer. There is one case,
> > however, where it does no
Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset
functions) introduces an init_clock_gating-pointer. There is one case,
however, where it does not get set, so that caused an OOPS. Change the
code to return -ENODEV in this case and propagate it to the upper
layers.
Signed-off-by: W
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:36:11 +0200
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset
> functions) introduces an init_clock_gating-pointer. There is one case,
> however, where it does not get set, so that caused an OOPS. Change the
> code to return -ENODEV in
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:36:11 +0200
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset
> functions) introduces an init_clock_gating-pointer. There is one case,
> however, where it does not get set, so that caused an OOPS. Change the
> code to return -ENODEV in
Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset
functions) introduces an init_clock_gating-pointer. There is one case,
however, where it does not get set, so that caused an OOPS. Change the
code to return -ENODEV in this case and propagate it to the upper
layers.
Signed-off-by: W