2015-04-24 0:56 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
> On 22/04/15 16:19, Greg Hackmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure why I haven't hit this while building with Android-x86's
>>> bionic, although it's the right thing to do.
>>
>> Maybe a difference
On 22/04/15 16:19, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure why I haven't hit this while building with Android-x86's
>> bionic, although it's the right thing to do.
>
> Maybe a difference in bionic versions? I know the bionic team made
>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why I haven't hit this while building with Android-x86's
> bionic, although it's the right thing to do.
Maybe a difference in bionic versions? I know the bionic team made
some recent (post-5.1) changes that unintentionally
Hi Greg,
On 16/04/15 17:55, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> A couple of files use ffs() without explicitly including strings.h.
> Some systems will pull in ffs()'s declaration through another header
> anyway, but not when compiling against bionic in AOSP master.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann
Thanks
A couple of files use ffs() without explicitly including strings.h.
Some systems will pull in ffs()'s declaration through another header
anyway, but not when compiling against bionic in AOSP master.
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann
---
nouveau/nouveau.c | 1 +
tests/modetest/modetest.c | 1
