[PATCH libdrm] freedreno: zero is a valid fd number, treat it as such

On 14 July 2015 at 09:14, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> Abeit quite unlikely to get hit by this bug here, let just fix it. >> >> v2: Correct conditional (do not call ioctl(DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD) >> when we already have the fd). >> >

[PATCH libdrm] freedreno: zero is a valid fd number, treat it as such

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > Abeit quite unlikely to get hit by this bug here, let just fix it. > > v2: Correct conditional (do not call ioctl(DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD) > when we already have the fd). > > Cc: freedreno at lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Rob Clar

[PATCH libdrm] freedreno: zero is a valid fd number, treat it as such

Abeit quite unlikely to get hit by this bug here, let just fix it. v2: Correct conditional (do not call ioctl(DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD) when we already have the fd). Cc: freedreno at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Rob Clark Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov --- freedreno/freedreno_bo.c | 6 +++--- fr

[PATCH libdrm] freedreno: zero is a valid fd number, treat it as such

Abeit quite unlikely to get hit by this bug here, let just fix it. Cc: freedreno at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Rob Clark Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov --- freedreno/freedreno_bo.c | 6 +++--- freedreno/kgsl/kgsl_bo.c | 1 + freedreno/msm/msm_bo.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deleti