On 16 July 2015 at 19:05, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> The whole thing is quite messy - the file is used to indicate that the
>> man pages were correctly generated prior to applying the "fixup" (alias)
>>
>> At the same time we use a rule
On 16 July 2015 at 19:05, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> The whole thing is quite messy - the file is used to indicate that the
>> man pages were correctly generated prior to applying the "fixup" (alias)
>>
>> At the same time we use a rule
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> The whole thing is quite messy - the file is used to indicate that the
> man pages were correctly generated prior to applying the "fixup" (alias)
>
> At the same time we use a rule with the same name, to create the same
> file if the
The whole thing is quite messy - the file is used to indicate that the
man pages were correctly generated prior to applying the "fixup" (alias)
At the same time we use a rule with the same name, to create the same
file if the generation has failed.
In other words - it attempts to create the file
