On 18 May 2017 at 14:46, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 18 May 2017 at 13:47, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>
>>> > Yes, I think you should change your build command. It's a shame that
>>> > autotools has this bug, but we'd like to avoid changing our codebase to
>>> > work around these, and in this case, it wo
On 18 May 2017 at 13:47, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>> > Yes, I think you should change your build command. It's a shame that
>> > autotools has this bug, but we'd like to avoid changing our codebase to
>> > work around these, and in this case, it would mean dropping the C99
>> > requirement and havin
On Thursday, 2017-05-18 12:10:31 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 17 May 2017 at 19:16, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 2017-05-17 13:58:42 +, Yu, Qiang wrote:
> >> Hi Emil,
> >>
> >> I didn't modify the code. I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 gcc 4.8.4, the configure
> >> pass but
> >> fail when
On 17 May 2017 at 19:16, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2017-05-17 13:58:42 +, Yu, Qiang wrote:
>> Hi Emil,
>>
>> I didn't modify the code. I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 gcc 4.8.4, the configure
>> pass but
>> fail when compile.
>>
>> I think my gcc support c99 but needs adding "-std=c99" to
ke to avoid changing our codebase to
work around these, and in this case, it would mean dropping the C99
requirement and having to downgrade the whole codebase to something
older.
>
> Regards,
> Qiang
>
> From: Emil Velikov
> Sent: Wednesda
2017-05-18 0:10 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
> On 17 May 2017 at 14:58, Yu, Qiang wrote:
>> Hi Emil,
>>
>> I didn't modify the code. I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 gcc 4.8.4, the configure
>> pass but
>> fail when compile.
>>
>> I think my gcc support c99 but needs adding "-std=c99" to enable it, and the
>>
On 17 May 2017 at 14:58, Yu, Qiang wrote:
> Hi Emil,
>
> I didn't modify the code. I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 gcc 4.8.4, the configure
> pass but
> fail when compile.
>
> I think my gcc support c99 but needs adding "-std=c99" to enable it, and the
> configure
> script add it into CC variable. When j
OK, but my build
script uses
"make CC=gcc".
If you think current state is OK, I can change my build script for that.
Regards,
Qiang
From: Emil Velikov
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 9:17:53 PM
To: Yu, Qiang
Cc: ML dri-devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH lib
Hi Qiang Yu,
On 17 May 2017 at 10:26, Qiang Yu wrote:
> error log:
> xf86drm.c: In function 'parse_separate_sysfs_files':
> xf86drm.c:3104:5: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in
> C99 mode
> for (unsigned i = ignore_revision ? 1 : 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(attrs); i++) {
>
error log:
xf86drm.c: In function 'parse_separate_sysfs_files':
xf86drm.c:3104:5: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in
C99 mode
for (unsigned i = ignore_revision ? 1 : 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(attrs); i++) {
^
xf86drm.c:3104:5: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to co
10 matches
Mail list logo
