On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 03:39:53 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>> acpi_video_backlight_support() is supposed to be called by other (vendor
>> specific) firmware backlight controls, not by native / raw backlight controls
>> like nv_backlight.
Hi,
On 05/22/2014 01:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 03:39:53 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>> acpi_video_backlight_support() is supposed to be called by other (vendor
>> specific) firmware backlight controls, not by native / raw backlight controls
>> like nv_backlight.
>>
>
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 03:39:53 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> acpi_video_backlight_support() is supposed to be called by other (vendor
> specific) firmware backlight controls, not by native / raw backlight controls
> like nv_backlight.
>
> Userspace will normally prefer firmware interfaces over ra
acpi_video_backlight_support() is supposed to be called by other (vendor
specific) firmware backlight controls, not by native / raw backlight controls
like nv_backlight.
Userspace will normally prefer firmware interfaces over raw interfaces, so
if acpi_video backlight support is present it will us
