On 4/2/2024 9:52 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> On 4/2/2024 7:32 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
On 4/2/2024 12:48 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Easwar Hariharan
> wrote:
>> I2C
On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> On 4/2/2024 7:32 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>>> On 4/2/2024 12:48 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced
On 4/2/2024 7:32 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> On 4/2/2024 12:48 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms.
On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> On 4/2/2024 12:48 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>>> series
On 4/2/2024 12:48 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
in the
