On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:48:04PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:26:36PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:15:07PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 2
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:26:36PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:15:07PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:47:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > This is a giant
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:47:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This is a giant CC list.
Yes, this is because I received feedback [1] on an earlier patchset
directing me to add the reviewers of patches to the cover letter as
well so that they get some context for the patch.
> There was one versi
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:26:36PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:15:07PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:47:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > This is a giant CC list.
> >
> > Yes, this is because I received feedback [1] on an earlie
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:15:07PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:47:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This is a giant CC list.
>
> Yes, this is because I received feedback [1] on an earlier patchset
> directing me to add the reviewers of patches to the cover lett
This is a giant CC list.
There was one version where you CC'd me on patch 6/12 but after that you
just CC'd me on the cover page. Something is messed up in your scripts
because Cc'ing me on just the cover is pointless.
regards,
dan carpenter
___
dri-d
Because period and duty cycle are defined in the PWM framework structs as ints
with units of nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited
to ~2.147 seconds. Consequently, applications desiring to set greater time
periods via the PWM framework are not be able to do so - like, fo
