On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Ilija Hadzic
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ilija Hadzic
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
>>
>
> Thanks. There will be a v3, though to address one tirvial comment
> (whitespace between binary '*' operator) that I
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Ilija Hadzic
wrote:
> copy_blit operation works only on integral number of pages
> so benchmarks shorter than one page size (4K) do not make sense
>
> v2: use RADEON_GPU_PAGE_SIZE instead of "magic" 1024 number and
> ? ?sweep sizes between 1x to 16x doubling
> ?
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilija Hadzic
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
>
Thanks. There will be a v3, though to address one tirvial comment
(whitespace between binary '*' operator) that I received in E-mail sent
directly to me.
I guess the diff v2/v3 will
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Ilija Hadzic
ihad...@research.bell-labs.com wrote:
copy_blit operation works only on integral number of pages
so benchmarks shorter than one page size (4K) do not make sense
v2: use RADEON_GPU_PAGE_SIZE instead of magic 1024 number and
sweep sizes between
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Alex Deucher wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ilija Hadzic ihad...@research.bell-labs.com
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Thanks. There will be a v3, though to address one tirvial comment
(whitespace between binary '*' operator) that I received in E-mail
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Ilija Hadzic
ihad...@research.bell-labs.com wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Alex Deucher wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ilija Hadzic ihad...@research.bell-labs.com
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Thanks. There will be a v3, though to address one
copy_blit operation works only on integral number of pages
so benchmarks shorter than one page size (4K) do not make sense
v2: use RADEON_GPU_PAGE_SIZE instead of "magic" 1024 number and
sweep sizes between 1x to 16x doubling
the size in each iteration; we get the same coverage, as
in
copy_blit operation works only on integral number of pages
so benchmarks shorter than one page size (4K) do not make sense
v2: use RADEON_GPU_PAGE_SIZE instead of magic 1024 number and
sweep sizes between 1xpage_size to 16xpage_size doubling
the size in each iteration; we get the same
