On 8/7/23 15:00, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hi,
diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h
b/include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h
index 05100e91ecb9..18017b3e5d9e 100644
--- a/include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h
+++ b/include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct
Samsung DSIM used in older Exynos SoCs (like Exynos 4210, 4x12, 3250)
doesn't report empty level of packer header FIFO. In case of those SoCs,
use the old way of waiting for empty command tranfsfer FIFO, removed
recently by commit 14806c641582 ("Drain command transfer FIFO before
transfer").
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:28 AM Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
>
> Samsung DSIM used in older Exynos SoCs (like Exynos 4210, 4x12, 3250)
> doesn't report empty level of packer header FIFO. In case of those SoCs,
> use the old way of waiting for empty command tranfsfer FIFO, removed
> recently by commit
On 7/21/23 13:28, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Samsung DSIM used in older Exynos SoCs (like Exynos 4210, 4x12, 3250)
doesn't report empty level of packer header FIFO. In case of those SoCs,
use the old way of waiting for empty command tranfsfer FIFO, removed
recently by commit 14806c641582 ("Drain
Samsung DSIM used in older Exynos SoCs (like Exynos 4210, 4x12, 3250)
doesn't report empty level of packer header FIFO. In case of those SoCs,
use the old way of waiting for empty command tranfsfer FIFO, removed
recently by commit 14806c641582 ("Drain command transfer FIFO before
transfer").