We currently rely on gcc dead-code elimination so the drm_agp_* helpers
are not called if drm_core_has_AGP() is false. That's ugly as hell so
provide "static inline" dummies for the case that AGP is disabled.
Fixes a build-regression introduced by:
commit 28ec711cd427f8b61f73712a43b8100ba8ca933
On 08/08/2013 02:19 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> We currently rely on gcc dead-code elimination so the drm_agp_* helpers
> are not called if drm_core_has_AGP() is false. That's ugly as hell so
> provide "static inline" dummies for the case that AGP is disabled.
>
> Fixes a build-regression introduc
On 08/08/2013 02:19 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> We currently rely on gcc dead-code elimination so the drm_agp_* helpers
> are not called if drm_core_has_AGP() is false. That's ugly as hell so
> provide "static inline" dummies for the case that AGP is disabled.
>
> Fixes a build-regression introduc
We currently rely on gcc dead-code elimination so the drm_agp_* helpers
are not called if drm_core_has_AGP() is false. That's ugly as hell so
provide "static inline" dummies for the case that AGP is disabled.
Fixes a build-regression introduced by:
commit 28ec711cd427f8b61f73712a43b8100ba8ca933