On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:28:41AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since patch #7 and #8 from the series:
> >
> >[PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks
> >
> >
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish"
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:49:43 +0200
> Since patch #7 and #8 from the series:
>
>[PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darw...@linutronix.de
>
> are now pending on the
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since patch #7 and #8 from the series:
>
>[PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darw...@linutronix.de
>
> are now pending
Hi,
Since patch #7 and #8 from the series:
[PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darw...@linutronix.de
are now pending on the lockdep/x86 IRQ state tracking patch series:
[PATCH 00/14] x86/entry:
