Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/7] Add SMEM-based speedbin matching

2024-06-20 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 22:10:13 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Newer (SM8550+) SoCs don't seem to have a nice speedbin fuse anymore, > but instead rely on a set of combinations of "feature code" (FC) and > "product code" (PC) identifiers to match the bins. This series adds > support for that. > > I

[PATCH v2 0/7] Add SMEM-based speedbin matching

2024-06-05 Thread Konrad Dybcio
Newer (SM8550+) SoCs don't seem to have a nice speedbin fuse anymore, but instead rely on a set of combinations of "feature code" (FC) and "product code" (PC) identifiers to match the bins. This series adds support for that. I suppose a qcom/for-soc immutable branch would be in order if we want to

[PATCH v2 0/7] Add SMEM-based speedbin matching

2024-04-17 Thread Konrad Dybcio
Newer (SM8550+) SoCs don't seem to have a nice speedbin fuse anymore, but instead rely on a set of combinations of "feature code" (FC) and "product code" (PC) identifiers to match the bins. This series adds support for that. I suppose a qcom/for-soc immutable branch would be in order if we want to