Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking

2019-11-01 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:10:17PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > From: Jason Gunthorpe > > 8 of the mmu_notifier using drivers (i915_gem, radeon_mn, umem_odp, hfi1, > scif_dma, vhost, gntdev, hmm) drivers are using a common pattern where > they only use invalidate_range_start/end and immediatel

Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking

2019-11-01 Thread Ralph Campbell
On 10/28/19 1:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: From: Jason Gunthorpe 8 of the mmu_notifier using drivers (i915_gem, radeon_mn, umem_odp, hfi1, scif_dma, vhost, gntdev, hmm) drivers are using a common pattern where they only use invalidate_range_start/end and immediately check the invalidating ran

[PATCH v2 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking

2019-10-28 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe 8 of the mmu_notifier using drivers (i915_gem, radeon_mn, umem_odp, hfi1, scif_dma, vhost, gntdev, hmm) drivers are using a common pattern where they only use invalidate_range_start/end and immediately check the invalidating range against some driver data structure to tell i