Hi Tomi,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:04:11AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 20/08/2019 04:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > @@ -,7 +1113,7 @@ int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, struct
> > drm_encoder *encoder)
> > {
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = drm_bridge_attach(encod
On 20/08/2019 04:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
@@ -,7 +1113,7 @@ int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, struct
drm_encoder *encoder)
{
int ret;
- ret = drm_bridge_attach(encoder, &dsi->bridge, NULL);
+ ret = drm_bridge_attach(encoder, &dsi->bridge, NULL, true);
Th
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:16:36 +0300
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Most bridge drivers create a DRM connector to model the connector at the
> output of the bridge. This model is historical and has worked pretty
> well so far, but causes several issues:
>
> - It prevents supporting more complex display
Most bridge drivers create a DRM connector to model the connector at the
output of the bridge. This model is historical and has worked pretty
well so far, but causes several issues:
- It prevents supporting more complex display pipelines where DRM
connector operations are split over multiple compo
