Hi Boris,
On 05/06/15 12:39, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:46:09 +0100
> Jon Hunter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 05/06/15 00:02, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>> Hi folks
>>>
>>> just a brief comment on this one:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>>
Clock
Hi Jon,
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:46:09 +0100
Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 05/06/15 00:02, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > Hi folks
> >
> > just a brief comment on this one:
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >
> >> Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
>
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 23:02:25 + (UTC)
Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> just a brief comment on this one:
>
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>
> > Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
> > (which returns a rounded rate from a requested
On 05/06/15 00:02, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> just a brief comment on this one:
>
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>
>> Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
>> (which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
>> value
Hi folks
just a brief comment on this one:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
> (which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
> value (errors are reported using negative error codes), which can
On 05/16, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 06:40 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >Hi Stephen,
> >
> >Adding Mikko in the loop (after all, he was the one complaining about
> >this signed long limitation in the first place, and I forgot to add
> >him in the Cc list :-/).
>
> I think I got it
On 05/15/2015 06:40 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Adding Mikko in the loop (after all, he was the one complaining about
> this signed long limitation in the first place, and I forgot to add
> him in the Cc list :-/).
I think I got it through linux-tegra anyway, but thanks :)
>
>
Hi Stephen,
Adding Mikko in the loop (after all, he was the one complaining about
this signed long limitation in the first place, and I forgot to add
him in the Cc list :-/).
Mikko, are you okay with the approach proposed by Stephen (adding a
new method) ?
On Thu, 7 May 2015 09:37:02 +0200
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 6 May 2015 23:39:53 -0700
Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/30, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
> > (which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
> > value (errors are reported using negative
On 04/30, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
> (which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
> value (errors are reported using negative error codes), which can lead
> to long overflow if the clock rate exceed 2Ghz.
>
Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
(which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
value (errors are reported using negative error codes), which can lead
to long overflow if the clock rate exceed 2Ghz.
Change ->round_rate() prototype to return
11 matches
Mail list logo