On 2/11/22 11:00, Matthew Auld wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 09:56, Thomas Hellström
wrote:
On 2/11/22 10:52, Matthew Auld wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 09:49, Thomas Hellström
wrote:
On 2/10/22 13:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Starting from DG2+, when dealing with LMEM, we assume that by defa
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 09:56, Thomas Hellström
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/11/22 10:52, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 09:49, Thomas Hellström
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/10/22 13:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
> >>> Starting from DG2+, when dealing with LMEM, we assume that by default
> >>> all use
On 2/11/22 10:52, Matthew Auld wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 09:49, Thomas Hellström
wrote:
On 2/10/22 13:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Starting from DG2+, when dealing with LMEM, we assume that by default
all userspace allocations should be placed in the non-mappable portion
of LMEM. Note that
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 09:49, Thomas Hellström
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/10/22 13:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > Starting from DG2+, when dealing with LMEM, we assume that by default
> > all userspace allocations should be placed in the non-mappable portion
> > of LMEM. Note that dumb buffers are not includ
On 2/10/22 13:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Starting from DG2+, when dealing with LMEM, we assume that by default
all userspace allocations should be placed in the non-mappable portion
of LMEM. Note that dumb buffers are not included here, since these are
not "GPU accelerated" and likely need CPU ac
Starting from DG2+, when dealing with LMEM, we assume that by default
all userspace allocations should be placed in the non-mappable portion
of LMEM. Note that dumb buffers are not included here, since these are
not "GPU accelerated" and likely need CPU access.
In a later patch userspace will be