Ah, good point. It looks like you've already added the drm-misc-next and drm
maintainers to here so as long as they're aware that should be fine
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 12:11 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Lyude,
>
> Em Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:49:11 -0400
> Lyude Paul escreveu:
>
> > wait,
Hi Lyude,
Em Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:49:11 -0400
Lyude Paul escreveu:
> wait, I think there's some confusion here. these patches have already been
> pushed
As the patch adding the warning was merged upstream at the 5.10 merge
window, the fixup one should also be added there, instead of waiting
wait, I think there's some confusion here. these patches have already been
pushed
On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 14:14 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The name of the argument is different, causing those warnings:
>
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Function parameter or member
>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
Thanks for the fixes! I will go ahead and push 11 and 12 to drm-misc-next.
On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 14:14 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The name of the argument is different, causing those warnings:
>
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Function
The name of the argument is different, causing those warnings:
./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Function parameter or
member 'video_code' not described in 'drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic'
./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Excess function parameter
'vic'
