Em Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:21:32 -0700
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:29:49 -0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > The enclosed patch should do the trick. I tested it with perl 5.10 and
> > perl 5.22 it worked fine with both versions.
>
> Indeed it seems to work - thanks!
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:29:49 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The enclosed patch should do the trick. I tested it with perl 5.10 and
> perl 5.22 it worked fine with both versions.
Indeed it seems to work - thanks! Applied to the docs tree, I'll get it
upstream before too long.
jon
On 17-11-2015 13:29, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:44:31 -0700
> Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:40:46 -0200
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>
>>> The above causes some versions of perl to fail, as keys expect a
>>> hash argument:
>>>
>>>
Em Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:44:31 -0700
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:40:46 -0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > The above causes some versions of perl to fail, as keys expect a
> > hash argument:
> >
> > Execution of .//scripts/kernel-doc aborted due to compilation
Hi Danilo,
Em Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:45:16 -0300
Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula escreveu:
> The "highlight" code is very sensible to the order of the hash keys,
> but the order of the keys cannot be predicted on Perl. It generates
> faulty DocBook entries like:
> - @device_for_each_child
>
>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:40:46 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The above causes some versions of perl to fail, as keys expect a
> hash argument:
>
> Execution of .//scripts/kernel-doc aborted due to compilation errors.
> Type of arg 1 to keys must be hash (not private array) at
>
The "highlight" code is very sensible to the order of the hash keys,
but the order of the keys cannot be predicted on Perl. It generates
faulty DocBook entries like:
- @device_for_each_child
We should use an array for that job, so we can guarantee that the order
of the regex execution on
