On 30/04/2024 14:08, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 30.04.2024 13:28, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> The field used to store the chunk size if 12 bits wide, and the encoding
>> is chunk_size = chunk_header.chunk_size << 12, which gives us a
>> theoretical [4k:8M] range. This range is further
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 01:28:51PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The field used to store the chunk size if 12 bits wide, and the encoding
> is chunk_size = chunk_header.chunk_size << 12, which gives us a
> theoretical [4k:8M] range. This range is further limited by
> implementation constraints,
Hi Boris,
On 30.04.2024 13:28, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The field used to store the chunk size if 12 bits wide, and the encoding
> is chunk_size = chunk_header.chunk_size << 12, which gives us a
> theoretical [4k:8M] range. This range is further limited by
> implementation constraints, and all
The field used to store the chunk size if 12 bits wide, and the encoding
is chunk_size = chunk_header.chunk_size << 12, which gives us a
theoretical [4k:8M] range. This range is further limited by
implementation constraints, and all known implementations seem to
impose a [128k:8M] range, so do the
