On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Shunqian Zheng
wrote:
> HI,
>
>
> On 2016å¹´06æ13æ¥ 18:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Shunqian Zheng
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On 2016å¹´06æ10æ¥ 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:26
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Shunqian Zheng
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2016å¹´06æ10æ¥ 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Shunqian Zheng
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Use DMA API instead of architecture internal functions like
>>> __cpuc_flush_dcache_area() etc.
>>>
>>>
HI,
On 2016å¹´06æ13æ¥ 18:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Shunqian Zheng
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 2016å¹´06æ10æ¥ 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Shunqian Zheng
>>> wrote:
Use DMA API instead of architecture internal
Hi
On 2016å¹´06æ10æ¥ 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Shunqian Zheng
> wrote:
>> Use DMA API instead of architecture internal functions like
>> __cpuc_flush_dcache_area() etc.
>>
>> To support the virtual device like DRM the virtual slave iommu
>> added in
On 13/06/16 10:56, Shunqian Zheng wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2016å¹´06æ10æ¥ 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Shunqian Zheng
>> wrote:
>>> Use DMA API instead of architecture internal functions like
>>> __cpuc_flush_dcache_area() etc.
>>>
>>> To support the
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Shunqian Zheng
wrote:
> Use DMA API instead of architecture internal functions like
> __cpuc_flush_dcache_area() etc.
>
> To support the virtual device like DRM the virtual slave iommu
> added in the previous patch, attaching to which the DRM can use
> it
Use DMA API instead of architecture internal functions like
__cpuc_flush_dcache_area() etc.
To support the virtual device like DRM the virtual slave iommu
added in the previous patch, attaching to which the DRM can use
it own domain->dev for dma_map_*(), dma_sync_*() even VOP is disabled.
With