On 02/10/2020 13:25, Boris Brezillon wrote:
If more than two jobs end up timeout-ing concurrently, only one of them
(the one attached to the scheduler acquiring the lock) is fully handled.
The other one remains in a dangling state where it's no longer part of
the scheduling queue, but still
If more than two jobs end up timeout-ing concurrently, only one of them
(the one attached to the scheduler acquiring the lock) is fully handled.
The other one remains in a dangling state where it's no longer part of
the scheduling queue, but still blocks something in scheduler, leading
to
