On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:15:12PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 7/21/21 12:07 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 21.07.21 um 07:09 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> > ...
> >>>
> >>> Can I simply put the patches in to drm-misc-next? There was some talk
> >>> about a to
On 7/21/21 12:07 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 21.07.21 um 07:09 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> ...
>>>
>>> Can I simply put the patches in to drm-misc-next? There was some talk
>>> about a topic branch?
>>>
>>
>> ... which AFAIU means that there's no need for a topic branch, since
Hi
Am 21.07.21 um 07:09 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
...
Can I simply put the patches in to drm-misc-next? There was some talk
about a topic branch?
... which AFAIU means that there's no need for a topic branch, since the
patches will be present in linux-next. And the EFI folks can use
Hello Thomas,
On 7/20/21 8:38 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 20.07.21 um 15:59 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:42:45PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> On 7/20/21 3:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
Hi
Am 20.07.21 um 15:59 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:42:45PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 7/20/21 3:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 04:59, Dave Airlie wrote:
[snip]
Can w
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:42:45PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 7/20/21 3:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 04:59, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >>>
> >>> Can we just merge via drm-misc a
On 7/20/21 3:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 04:59, Dave Airlie wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>> Can we just merge via drm-misc and make sure the acks are present and
>>> I'll deal with the fallout if any.
>>>
>>
>> Fin
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 04:59, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 18:11, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am 13.07.21 um 18:59 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> > > > On 6/25/21 3:09 PM, Javier Ma
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 04:59, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 18:11, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 13.07.21 um 18:59 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> > > On 6/25/21 3:09 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > >> The simplefb and simpledrm drivers match against a
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 18:11, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 13.07.21 um 18:59 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> > On 6/25/21 3:09 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The simplefb and simpledrm drivers match against a "simple-framebuffer"
> >> device, but for aarch64 this is only re
Hi
Am 13.07.21 um 18:59 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
On 6/25/21 3:09 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The simplefb and simpledrm drivers match against a "simple-framebuffer"
device, but for aarch64 this is only registered when using Device Trees
and there's a node with a "simple-framebu
On 6/25/21 3:09 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The simplefb and simpledrm drivers match against a "simple-framebuffer"
> device, but for aarch64 this is only registered when using Device Trees
> and there's a node with a "simple-framebuffer" compatible string.
>
> There is no code to regist
The simplefb and simpledrm drivers match against a "simple-framebuffer"
device, but for aarch64 this is only registered when using Device Trees
and there's a node with a "simple-framebuffer" compatible string.
There is no code to register a "simple-framebuffer" platform device when
using EFI inste
13 matches
Mail list logo
