On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 11:23 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > Sure this will work, but still we need somehow to be able to
> > determine
> > this "if it's different" state. In your solution we just move that
> > comparison to drm_connector_update_edid_property, which is quite
> > fine
> > for me.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 08:36:46AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:49:23AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > In fact I was
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:49:23AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > > In fact I was wrong - when it worked, it was using exactly
> > > > > those
> > > > > patches :
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:49:23AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > > In fact I was wrong - when it worked, it was using exactly those
> > > > patches :). With clean drm-tip - it seems to work ocassionally
> > > > and it
> > > >
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:49 +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > > In fact I was wrong - when it worked, it was using exactly
> > > > those
> > > > patches :). With clean drm-tip - it seems to work ocassionally
> > > > and it
> > >
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > > In fact I was wrong - when it worked, it was using exactly those
> > > patches :). With clean drm-tip - it seems to work ocassionally
> > > and it
> > > doesn't update the actual display edid and other stuff, so even
> > > when
> > >
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:17:49AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 09:05 +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 08:35 +0100, Peres, Martin wrote:
> > > On 19/08/2019 10:23, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 09:05 +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 08:35 +0100, Peres, Martin wrote:
> > On 19/08/2019 10:23, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So igt isn't valid userspace (it's ju
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 08:35 +0100, Peres, Martin wrote:
> On 19/08/2019 10:23, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > So igt isn't valid userspace (it's just good testcases). Can we
> > > repro
> > > the
> > > same on real userspa
On 19/08/2019 10:23, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:43:18AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
>>
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 23:07 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:43:18AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:43:18AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:55:48PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy
> > > wrote:
> > > > This series introduce to
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:06 PM Lisovskiy, Stanislav
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:55:48PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > This series introduce to drm a way to determine if something else
> > > except connection_status had
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:55:48PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > This series introduce to drm a way to determine if something else
> > except connection_status had changed during probing, which
> > can be used by other drivers as wel
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:55:48PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> This series introduce to drm a way to determine if something else
> except connection_status had changed during probing, which
> can be used by other drivers as well. Another i915 specific part
> uses this approach to determine
This series introduce to drm a way to determine if something else
except connection_status had changed during probing, which
can be used by other drivers as well. Another i915 specific part
uses this approach to determine if edid had changed without
changing the connection status and send a hotplug
17 matches
Mail list logo
