Hm, thinking about this again, there's still something which is a bit
off with the new approach. Let's say the caller sets MODE_ID to another
blob ID, but with the same blob payload. DRM core is smart enough to
figure out that the mode didn't change and skip the modeset. However,
the check
Ville, any news on this?
On 10/13/22 13:02, Simon Ser wrote:
So no tests that actually verify that the kernel properly rejects
stuff stuff like modesets, gamma LUT updates, plane movement,
etc.?
Pondering this a bit more, it just occurred to me the current driver
level checks might easily lead to confusing behaviour.
On 10/13/22 13:02, Simon Ser wrote:
So no tests that actually verify that the kernel properly rejects
stuff stuff like modesets, gamma LUT updates, plane movement,
etc.?
Pondering this a bit more, it just occurred to me the current driver
level checks might easily lead to confusing behaviour.
> > > So no tests that actually verify that the kernel properly rejects
> > > stuff stuff like modesets, gamma LUT updates, plane movement,
> > > etc.?
> >
> > Pondering this a bit more, it just occurred to me the current driver
> > level checks might easily lead to confusing behaviour. Eg. is
> >
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 11:48:49AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:45:09 +0300
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:37:00PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:09:55 +0300
> > > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > >
> > > > That would
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:45:09 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:37:00PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:09:55 +0300
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >
> > > That would actively discourage people from even attempting the
> > > "just dump all the state
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:45:09PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:37:00PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:09:55 +0300
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >
> > > That would actively discourage people from even attempting the
> > > "just dump all the state
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:37:00PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:09:55 +0300
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> > That would actively discourage people from even attempting the
> > "just dump all the state into the ioctl" approach with async flips
> > since even the props whose
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:09:55 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> That would actively discourage people from even attempting the
> "just dump all the state into the ioctl" approach with async flips
> since even the props whose value isn't even changing would be rejected.
About that.
To me it looks
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 05:19:07PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:52:56PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 06:43:15PM +, Simon Ser wrote:
> > > This series adds support for DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC for atomic
> > > commits, aka. "immediate flip"
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:52:56PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 06:43:15PM +, Simon Ser wrote:
> > This series adds support for DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC for atomic
> > commits, aka. "immediate flip" (which might result in tearing).
> > The feature was only available
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 06:43:15PM +, Simon Ser wrote:
> This series adds support for DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC for atomic
> commits, aka. "immediate flip" (which might result in tearing).
> The feature was only available via the legacy uAPI, however for
> gaming use-cases it may be desirable
On 9/29/22 14:43, Simon Ser wrote:
> This series adds support for DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC for atomic
> commits, aka. "immediate flip" (which might result in tearing).
> The feature was only available via the legacy uAPI, however for
> gaming use-cases it may be desirable to enable it via the
This series adds support for DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC for atomic
commits, aka. "immediate flip" (which might result in tearing).
The feature was only available via the legacy uAPI, however for
gaming use-cases it may be desirable to enable it via the atomic
uAPI too.
- Patchwork:
15 matches
Mail list logo
