On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 14:57 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:31:20AM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > @Bjorn:
> > Hey Bjorn, are we good with this series? Any more wishes or
> > suggestions?
>
> Sorry, haven't had a chance to go through it yet.
>
> FWIW, I just tried
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:31:20AM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> @Bjorn:
> Hey Bjorn, are we good with this series? Any more wishes or
> suggestions?
Sorry, haven't had a chance to go through it yet.
FWIW, I just tried to apply these on top of pci/devres, but it failed
here:
Applying:
@Bjorn:
Hey Bjorn, are we good with this series? Any more wishes or
suggestions?
P.
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 14:39 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> Changes in v3:
> - Use the term "PCI devres API" in some forgotten places.
> - Fix more grammar errors in patch #3.
> - Remove the comment
Changes in v3:
- Use the term "PCI devres API" in some forgotten places.
- Fix more grammar errors in patch #3.
- Remove the comment advising to call (the outdated) pcim_intx() in pci.c
- Rename __pcim_request_region_range() flags-field "exclusive" to
"req_flags", since this is what
