Hi Boris,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 11:56:16AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 12:33:35 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:44:56PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > And use it in drivers accessing the bridge->next field directly.
> > > This is part of
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 12:33:35 +0200
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:44:56PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > And use it in drivers accessing the bridge->next field directly.
> > This is part of our attempt to make the bridge chain
Hi Boris,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:44:56PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> And use it in drivers accessing the bridge->next field directly.
> This is part of our attempt to make the bridge chain a double-linked list
> based on the generic list helpers.
>
>
On 23/10/2019 17:44, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> And use it in drivers accessing the bridge->next field directly.
> This is part of our attempt to make the bridge chain a double-linked list
> based on the generic list helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> * Inline
And use it in drivers accessing the bridge->next field directly.
This is part of our attempt to make the bridge chain a double-linked list
based on the generic list helpers.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon
---
Changes in v3:
* Inline drm_bridge_chain_get_next_bridge() (Suggested by Laurent)
