On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:41:33AM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:12:05AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 08:59 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > Only x86 and in some cases PPC have support added in drm_cache.c for the
> > > clflush class of
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:12:05AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote:
On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 08:59 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Only x86 and in some cases PPC have support added in drm_cache.c for the
clflush class of functions. However warning once is sufficient to taint
the log instead of spamming it
On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 08:59 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Only x86 and in some cases PPC have support added in drm_cache.c for the
> clflush class of functions. However warning once is sufficient to taint
> the log instead of spamming it with "Architecture has no drm_cache.c
> support" every few
Only x86 and in some cases PPC have support added in drm_cache.c for the
clflush class of functions. However warning once is sufficient to taint
the log instead of spamming it with "Architecture has no drm_cache.c
support" every few millisecond. Switch to WARN_ONCE() so we still get
the log
