Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested

On 2020-01-06 10:24, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote: > On 02.01.2020 11:08, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: >>> From: Peter Rosin >>> >>> The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the >>> requested, if a slight overcl

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested

On 04.01.2020 19:12, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > content is safe > > Hi Claudiu > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:08:48AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: >>> From:

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested

On 02.01.2020 11:08, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: >> From: Peter Rosin >> >> The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the >> requested, if a slight overclocking would result in a rate significantly >> closer to the

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested

Hi Claudiu. On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:25:40AM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote: > > > On 04.01.2020 19:12, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > > content is safe > > > > Hi Claudiu > > > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:08:4

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested

Hi Claudiu On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:08:48AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > > From: Peter Rosin > > > > The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the > > requested, if a slight overclocking would result in a r

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > From: Peter Rosin > > The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the > requested, if a slight overclocking would result in a rate significantly > closer to the requested rate than if the conservative lower pixe

[PATCH v3 5/6] drm: atmel-hlcdc: prefer a lower pixel-clock than requested

From: Peter Rosin The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the requested, if a slight overclocking would result in a rate significantly closer to the requested rate than if the conservative lower pixel-clock rate is selected. The fixed patch has the logic the other way arou