Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi()

2024-05-06 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:43 PM Douglas Anderson wrote: > The current mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros are non-intutitive because > they contain a hidden "return" statement that will return out of the > _caller_ of the macro. Let's mark them as deprecated and instead > introduce some new macros that

Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi()

2024-05-02 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 01/05/2024 17:41, Douglas Anderson wrote: The current mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros are non-intutitive because they contain a hidden "return" statement that will return out of the _caller_ of the macro. Let's mark them as deprecated and instead introduce some new macros that are more

[PATCH v3 5/9] drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi()

2024-05-01 Thread Douglas Anderson
The current mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros are non-intutitive because they contain a hidden "return" statement that will return out of the _caller_ of the macro. Let's mark them as deprecated and instead introduce some new macros that are more intuitive. These new macros are less optimal when an