On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:45:38 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Please exuse me for the spam, I missed the triggered WARN_ON because of
> the dropped patch.
>
> Declaring the mask of supported interrupts proved to be error-prone. It
> is very easy to add a bit with no corresponding backing block o
On 2023-07-27 17:45:38, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Please exuse me for the spam, I missed the triggered WARN_ON because of
> the dropped patch.
>
> Declaring the mask of supported interrupts proved to be error-prone. It
> is very easy to add a bit with no corresponding backing block or to miss
> th
Please exuse me for the spam, I missed the triggered WARN_ON because of
the dropped patch.
Declaring the mask of supported interrupts proved to be error-prone. It
is very easy to add a bit with no corresponding backing block or to miss
the INTF TE bit. Replace this static configuration with the ir
